Your Property Used for Private Travel Siezed

/ , , / , , , , , , / 0 Comments

This post is still in draft form. If you are reading it take the information here as only for training and educational purposes. (Taken from Jimmy Jones on AF channel 9/5/23.)

Here are the Undisputed Facts for my proposed scheduling order.

  1. Colo. Const., Art. II, § 3 guarantees Plaintiff the inalienable right to acquire, possess, and protect property.
  2. Colo. Const., Art. II, § 25 guarantees Plaintiff judicial process for the protection of inalienable rights.
  3. The Fourteenth Amendment prohibits the deprivation of property without due process of law.
  4. Plaintiff’s right to make use of the public highways of the state has been determined to be an inalienable right by the Colorado Supreme Court.
  5. On March 7, 2021, Plaintiff was not provided adequate notice of any proceeding before his inalienable right to make use of the public highways of the state was seized by Deputy Strongarm and Deputy Dumphess.
  6. On March 7, 2021, Plaintiff was not given opportunity to be heard before his inalienable right to make use of the public highways of the state was seized by Deputy Strongarm and Deputy Dumphess.
  7. On March 7, 2021, Plaintiff was not afforded a judicial hearing before his inalienable right to make use of the public highways of the state was seized by Deputy Strongarm and Deputy Dumphess.
  8. On March 7, 2021, the persons who made the decision to seize Plaintiff’s inalienable right to make use of the public highways of the state were neither fair nor impartial.
  9. On March 7, 2021, Plaintiff was the rightful owner of all property seized from him at approximately 3:36 p.m. MST by Deputy Dumphess, Deputy Strongarm, and Marshall Colormelaw.
  10. On March 7, 2021, at approximately 3:10 p.m. MST, Plaintiff’s property was lawfully parked on the south side of San Juan Street / Main Street / Pagosa Street, just east of North 3rd Street.
  11. On March 7, 2021, neither Deputy Strongarm nor Deputy Dumphess articulated any reasonable community caretaking exception as the cause for seizing Plaintiff’s property.
  12. On March 7, 2021, neither Deputy Strongarm nor Deputy Dumphess seized Plaintiff’s property as a result of Plaintiff being arrested.
  13. Plaintiff was never provided adequate notice of any proceeding involving the property seized from him on March 7, 2021 by Deputy Strongarm, Deputy Dumphess, and Marshall Colormelaw.
  14. Plaintiff was never afforded the opportunity to be heard at any proceeding involving the property seized from him on March 7, 2021 by Deputy Strongarm, Deputy Dumphess, and Marshall Colormelaw.
  15. The persons who made the final decision on the sale of the property seized from Plaintiff on March 7, 2021 by Deputy Strongarm, Deputy Dumphess, and Marshall Colormelaw were neither fair nor impartial.